Category Archives: Uncategorized

Today’s Terrorism News

McChrystal Fired, Replaced With Petraeus

Swift decision to dismiss McChrystal: The Wall Street Journal.

Afghanistan regrets McChrystal’s departure: Reuters via ABC Australia.

Afghan leaders saddened by McChrystal departure, optimistic about Petraeus: The Washington Post.

Continue reading

Today’s Terrorism News

As you know, the Center on Law and Security is closed this week for our move to beautiful new quarters. However, we are forwarding the articles for you to read and digest on your own. We’ll be back with the full news summary next week.

Questioning Gen. McChrystal’s Future

McChrystal’s fate in limbo as he prepares to meet Obama: The New York Times (1).

General faces unease among his own troops, too: The New York Times (2).

Continue reading

Today’s Terrorism News

As you know, the Center on Law and Security is closed this week for our move to beautiful new quarters. However, we are forwarding the articles for you to read and digest on your own. We’ll be back with the full news summary next week.

Faisal Shahzad Pleads Guilty:

Covered in ABC News; The Wall Street Journal; The Los Angeles Times; The New York Times.

Excerpts from the transcript available from AP.

Continue reading

Today’s Terrorism News

As you know, the Center on Law and Security is closed this week for our move to beautiful new quarters. However, we are forwarding the articles for you to read and digest on your own. We’ll be back with the full news summary next week.

Deal Could Yield Guilty Plea From bin Laden’s Cook: http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/06/19/1688924/deal-could-yield-guilty-plea-from.html

Continue reading

No Updates Next Week

The CenterLine blog won’t be updated the week starting Monday, June 21st, and will return on June 28th. To be certain that you don’t miss any of the CenterLine’s updates, please be sure to subscribe to the blog by clicking the button in the right-hand column or follow us @CenterLineBlog on Twitter.

Today’s Terrorism News

*Faisal Shahzad, suspected of planting a car bomb in Times Square earlier this month, appeared in federal district court in Manhattan yesterday. In a hearing which lasted nine minutes, his attorney, federal defender Julia Gatto, did not contest, at least for the time being, prosecutor Randall Jackson’s request that Shahzad be held without bail. The five charges against Shahzad include attempted terrorism transcending national boundaries and attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction, both of which could lead to life sentences.

The investigation of the Times Square bomb plot has included Mobile Interrogation Teams set up as part of the new High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group, according to Reuters.

Continue reading

ACLU Writes to the White House, House Holds Hearing on Drones

Anthony Romero, executive director of the ACLU, wrote a letter directly to President Obama yesterday, in which he describes the Predator program, if news reports about it are correct, as in violation of international law, unconstitutional “at least in so far as it affects American citizens,” and “unwise.”

Also yesterday, the National Security and Foreign Affairs Subcommittee of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform held the second of two hearings on the issue. The witnesses’ pre-prepared testimonies are available here.  It follows a hearing held on March 23rd, for which the pre-prepared testimonies are available here.

Share

Editors’ Note

True to its name, the CenterLine seeks to present not a sole point of view but rather a range of perspectives on urgent, and often hotly debated, matters of national security policy. To that end, we endeavor to provide diverse commentary from the most knowledgeable and well-respected experts in the field, as well as links to important news and opinions on other sites. Of course, it would be impossible for anyone, ourselves included, to agree with the full range of ideas presented here. From time to time, we will contribute the Center’s own thoughts. Our goal is not to dictate conclusions, but to provide a broad base of information and perspective, in order to help our readers reach a more informed understanding of complex and contentious issues vital to the future of our nation and the world.

Share

Why All the Steam about Obama’s Team?

by Ted Sorensen

Does the volley of slings and arrows aimed at the Obama White House staff, including Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel – with even wise man Les Gelb calling for “a sweeping staff shakeup” ousting most of the principal players “to save his presidency” – mean that our president selected the worst and dumbest; or is this simply an overreaction in the national press and Democratic Party to the aberrational Senate election in Massachusetts?

I remember all too clearly 48-49 years ago when my colleagues on the Kennedy presidential team, previously called “the best and the brightest,” were the target of similar attacks, as most White House staffs in their first two years have been. It is easy to criticize. Mr. Gelb even condemned Obama’s “flagrantly foolish rhetoric,” making one wonder how he could ever have been elected.

The underlying premise is the claim that Obama’s first 15 months were a failure. Failure? The man who stemmed the initial hemorrhage of the worst economic collapse since the Great Depression, who raised our international standing from near zero (due to repeated torture and other violations of international law, and unilateral military interventions as a substitute for multilateral diplomacy) to a renewed level of widespread international respect, who obtained passage by the House of his first dozen or more legislative proposals? A failure? Similar epithets were hurled by pundits and political detractors at Kennedy and his team during and after his first year or two in office, when they asked:

Why is there no ‘grand design’ for global policy? Why is the president taking on all the international crises inherited from his predecessor? Why are his poll ratings not as high as they were soon after his election? The president is occasionally inconsistent, changing his mind or position; the president has not achieved all of his formidable objectives in one year; the president should not have raised expectations so high; the president is all speeches, no accomplishments, yet calling on us self-appointed experts very rarely; the president is relying more on principle than politics by seeking lofty goals instead of small accomplishments; why can’t his staff work more than 24 hours a day to return our calls?

After Kennedy left behind the first step toward arms control in the nuclear age, new success in the conquest of space as he literally reached for the moon, new legislative protection for the minimally paid, the mentally ill and challenged, plus a comprehensive civil rights program reversing centuries of discrimination, plus the Peace Corps, expanded world trade and a host of measures reviving the eroding protective networks of the Roosevelt/Truman New Deal/Fair Deal, no one was asking those questions. I predict they will not be asked about the Obama administration at its close in 2016.

Continue reading

Thomas Joscelyn’s Start as an Intel Analyst

by Joshua L. Dratel

The co-author of Monday’s WSJ op-ed piece with Debra Burlingame was Thomas Joscelyn, who testified before Congress on July 8, 2009, and was grilled by certain Democrats, including William Delahunt.  Joscelyn conceded (a) that he’s not a lawyer;  and (b) that he does not have any professional background in intelligence or law enforcement.  He also made the following remarkable admission in an exchange with Delahunt:

Mr. Delahunt:         How did you come to become an intel agent?

Mr. Joscelyn:         Well, I’m not an intel agent,  I’m an intel analyst.

Mr. Delahunt:        I mean, an intel analyst, right.

Mr. Joscelyn:         It was an entrepreneurial endeavor after 9/11 that I started.

Therein, perhaps, lies the true face of the opposition?

copyright © 2010 by Joshua L. Dratel

Share